People who have doctorates in the liberal arts
are interested in improving their intellects. Companies,
however, rarely hire people who are not concerned with
the financial gain that can be obtained by hard work in
the business world. As a result, companies rarely hire
people who have doctorates in the liberal arts
The conclusion of the argument follows logically if
which one of the follwing is assumed
(A) Companies would hire people with doctorates in the liberal
arts if such people were interested in the money available
in the business world.
(B) Some people who ae interested in the liberal arts do not care
about money.
(C) The only people not interested in making money in the business
world are people who are interested in improving their intellects.
(D) People with doctorates in the liberal arts are interested in employment
in the business world.
(E) Only people not concerned with making money in the business world are
interested in improving their intellects.
질문 1. Companies, however, rarely hire people who are not concerned with the financial gain
이 부문을요, 제가 아는 사람들은
충분 필요
not concerned --------> rarely hire
로 놓던데 거꾸로 아닌가요?? 즉 rarely hire가 충분이 되고 not concerned가 필요 아닌가요???
사람들이 말한게 맞다면 왜그런지 자세히 설명좀 부탁드려요!!!! plz!!
질문 2. 보기에서 C번과 E번의 차이 점이 뭔가요??? 아무리 봐도 둘다 only 들어가고 따라서 도식화도 둘다
not interested -------> interested in improving intellects
or concerned
in making money
이렇게 되는것 같은데요.
도와주시는분 복받으실 거에요 *^^*